Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Wearing Pants, Really?


Wearing Pants, Really?                                               http://burst.to/2b3

Last night I noticed that two of my Facebook friends said they were attending “Wear Pants to Church Day.” It really is in an effort by feminists to make the leaders of the church pay more attention to them. Here’s the first paragraph on the page:

LDS Women Unite: Wear pants to church in solidarity for women's equality. If you already wear pants to church (we're talking to you men!), we invite you to show your support by wearing a purple shirt, tie, socks, or ribbon, purple being a color historically associated with the suffrage movement. This is the first act of All Enlisted, a direct action group for Mormon women to advocate for equality within our faith. 

So, many have jumped onto the band-wagon, not realizing that they are supporting a rebellious movement. In fact, many have just thought that this is only about a woman’s right to wear pants to church and making people feel comfortable who do not have nice clothing, when really it is a feminist group trying to gain sympathy for their misgivings about not holding the Priesthood and not being the main leaders of the Church. Whether they think that the Lord cares what a person wears to church or not is really not the issue, but a mask for the issue; and who gave them the right to speak for Latter-day Saint women and issue a call to action?

Last night I wrote this on Facebook:

I find it highly disturbing that during a month when we should be focusing on the birth of the Savior and all the wonderful things He has done for us, there are those who think that it is more important to bring division and politics into our Sunday worship, taking the focus off of Him and putting it onto themselves. 

I will gladly wear a dress to Sacrament meeting, and if the Lord (or His servants) ask me to wear sackcloth and ashes, I will do that, too.

I wish that people would come to understand, that you cannot legislate right and wrong with the Lord. He is the Lawgiver.

Some people think that right and wrong fluctuate from person to person and time to time. One could generally argue correctly that the wearing of pants is a norm for women now. But their post does not just represent the wearing of pants, unless you mean that so figuratively. Because there are women who are seeking to receive ordinations that are the same as the brethren of the Church hold. If that is not the order of the Church on the earth, I think that we should accept that. After all it is Christ’s Church, and I trust Him to know what He is doing. So while I believe that there are some secular variations that are necessary and good in society, and that this has always been so, I also believe that there are eternal truths that never will change, meaning that God has the power and right to set His own laws and expectations. But that does not mean that I can force my opinion on anyone else, nor do I take kindly to them trying to do so to me.

Some women just feel so inferior, and that is pretty sad. No one dictates that we have to wear dresses; in fact, women go to the temple in pants. But if some want to wear pants, do they really need everyone else to follow? I guess that I have always known I'm pretty important. I don't need anyone to tell me that I should feel inferior because I'm fine with the culture of the church that says to wear a dress. I'm not too great about wanting to dress up, so it seems nice to have one day in the week that is set apart from the rest, where dressing up is one way that I show respect and reverence for the Lord.

But why at a time of year when we should be looking for unity and peace on earth, are some people within the Church suing for division? That is not of Christ (and you can find that in the scriptures, both ancient and modern) no matter how you dress it!

I have seen so many judgments made by Latter-day Saints concerning other Latter-day Saints. Do they really believe that all of the congregations in this world are so shallow as to not be accepting of those who dress or act differently? I think that some might need to leave their little cubbies for a while and get out and see the world. Not everybody is preoccupied with dress and outward appearance. But when we choose our dress as a political statement, then it becomes a part of our inward battle, and we are unable to focus on true worship or service.

Truly Jesus cared for the poor and the needy. This is part of the mission of our Church. I think that the best way to feel comfortable ourselves is not by drawing attention to ourselves, but by reaching out to others to help them feel comfortable. The majority of the wards in the world are like that, because the Church is a worldwide church. Not all areas are affluent. Some are down-right dirt poor. If our wards are falling short in this area, we all need to look inward instead of always pointing the finger at someone else; spiritual change comes from within, one individual at a time. If we are preoccupied with ourselves, how can we reach out to others and make them feel comfortable and at home? So instead of worrying about the wearing of pants, or the prettiest dress, or the fanciest scarf or hat; or a purple tie, or white or black socks, or whatever; we should worry about receiving the Lord’s image in our countenances. We should come to the Sacrament table with a broken heart and a contrite spirit.

Jesus was required to conform to the social and religious customs of his time. Though he is the Son of God, He respected Jewish law and, therefore, did not begin His ministry until He was 30. Nor did he at any time ever follow His own social agenda, but submitted most humbly to the will of His Father in all things. Jesus taught and did those things that His Father commanded Him to do.

The Lord's sacrifice for all of us is beyond comprehension. He loves us all so much. For me, Sacrament meeting is about honoring His sacrifice and seeking to align myself to do His will. It is a time when we are to seek edification and fellowship. It is not a time to draw attention to social agendas that distract from the purpose of the sacrament.

Joseph Smith said that it was important for us to all understand the nature of God and our relationship to Him. Jesus knew who He was and, as a result, He could follow God's will and skip the temptations to try to have to prove who He was. He lived within the Law of Moses until He fulfilled the Law. It seems like there are still a lot of people who are bothered by Him and ashamed of Him, or trying to get rid of Him in one way or another. The focus of Sacrament meeting should be the Atonement of Jesus Christ; pushing a political agenda in His chapel is neither worshipful nor respectful. Puts a new light on the Lord saying that He received His wounds in the house of his friends, or even at His own dinner table. (see Zechariah 13:6)

The Pharisees were apostates, and they were jealous of His power. They did not like to see the authority that He carried or the miracles He performed. Sound familiar? The question that I see resurfacing again and again is, “Do you or do you not believe that we have modern-day prophets on the earth today?" The Pharisees did not like what Jesus had to do or say, much like some members of the church do not like what the leaders that Jesus has called have to say.

There are women who do wear pants in our ward, and they are accepted and loved. This Wear Pants page has nothing to do with wearing pants. This page has to do with seeking power. We are still waging the same war as we did with the War in Heaven. Satan thought He knew better than God how to conduct our Heavenly Father’s estate. He was jealous of Jesus and of His power, and he sought to usurp that power. It isn't much different than the Pharisee's jealousy of Jesus or some women’s jealousy of the Priesthood. But the difference is that we were all on the Lord’s side then, every one of us. I think that most of us still are, but many are misdirected. None of us will be able to progress to nobility without humility. We need to seek to do things the Lord’s way and in the Lord’s timetable. There is not a necessity for women’s suffragists within the church. Our voices have always counted. We sat in our Father’s councils. We need to look both heavenward and inward and try to recognize and remember who we are and who our Father is.

Post Script: 

Please attend your Sacrament meetings knowing that the word Sacrament means sacred memory. What we need to wear to Sacrament meeting is a broken heart and a contrite spirit; as we do so consistently, we will receive the Lord's image in our countenances. 

More about the Sacrament

14 comments:

  1. "[...]when really it is a feminist group trying to gain sympathy for their misgivings about not holding the Priesthood and not being the main leaders of the Church."

    You totally hit the nail on the head with this! Feminist Mormon Housewives are the ones behind this (confirmed by going to their website) and I can't agree with your assessment more. I heard about them earlier this year, and had some preconceived idea of what they were in my head.. went to their website and realized it was RADICALLY different than what I thought it would be and that's NOT a good thing. I'm admittedly not socially and politically conservative, but this is WAY too left for me. Like WAY WAY out there.

    Wearing a dress or a skirt to church has nothing to do with subservience. It has to do with respect. Now, I realize that not all women are able to wear dresses to church due to health reasons (a lady I know wore dress slacks to church because she was unable to sit up in a chair for long periods and had to recline/lay down on the floor for comfort) or financial reasons or just for comfort (Some women can suffer from chaffing of their thighs rubbing together and wearing skirts or dresses aggravate the condition to the point of causing blisters and bleeding). If you don't draw attention to it, nobody will say anything; and hopefully not judge you.

    The "Look at me, I'm wearing pants to church, what are YOU going to do about it?" mentality is unhealthy. It's like these women are having an identity/gender crisis and are not happy with the Church's leadership and how it's run.

    Personally, I couldn't ever not wear a dress or pants to church. I consider myself to be more on the feminine side, and I LOVE wearing dresses, and I LOVE wearing skirts. Unfortunately, it's not practical for everyday life, but when I get the chance to dress up, I go for it!

    These women call themselves feminists, but I think they are far from it. They are unhappy about their position in life, and with the Church. In my personal opinion, if you're THAT unhappy with the Church, why are you still a member? Your "feminist movement" isn't going to force a change in the Church and the way it's run, so really.. you're fighting a hopeless cause. All you are doing is creating a division, and you're alienating a TON of people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amber, I appreciate your comments. I do believe many of these people are misdirected and/or fighting with inner personal problems. I hope they can learn to work through things with more faith in the Lord and themselves, and without causing undue grief for themselves and for so many others.

      Delete
  2. AMEN! Thank you so much for your thoughts! This whole thing is making my heart hurt, and as you said, because it's Christmas time and there are other things we should be doing. I live in Santa Fe, NM. Things are very "come as you are" here. We have several sisters who wear pants to church for various reasons, and no one cares. We'd care if they didn't come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. Have a wonderful Christmas season. Best wishes.

      Delete
  3. Bravo! I could not have written anything better. Therefore I shall share.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Kathryn. I appreciate that so much. Have a wonderful Christmas season. "And may God bless us every one."

      Delete
    2. Dear Kathryn,
      I appreciate it even more now that I have seen what an incredible writer and blogger you are. I'm just working on writing down my thoughts, but you document and link and report!
      Thanks,
      Heidi

      Delete
  4. Thank you for this post. The first thing that came to my mind in all of this were questions that each of us are asked when attending our temple recommend interviews.

    "Do you support for or affiliation with any group or individual that teach practices that are not in agreement with church teachings."

    "Do you sustain the President of the Church and his authority, and other general authorities and local church leaders."

    The women and men within the church who support this cause walk a fine line.

    "Choose you this day whom ye will serve"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eric, I think they do, but I don't think most of them know they do. We need to show more charity, which means we need to feel it, too.

      Another blog I saw today is great. The author has many great posts. http://bit.ly/TQXZ43

      Delete
  5. This was extremely well written and I can't agree with you more. This alarms me as we are seeing this from within the Church rather than from the outside.

    In our ward I really haven't seen anyone women wearing pants, not that it would bother me. I am not sure I understand their statement of the pants.

    I do know that some of the ym in our ward feel it is unfair that they have to dress up with white shirts and ties and the young women wear what looks like a school shirt with a skirt. They feel they dress up way more than the yw. I feel we should all be dressed in our best as we are taking part in the ordinance of the Sacrament.

    I think as women we have been making our dress for Sunday more and more and more casual and comfortable.

    The YM should be in white shirts and ties, and the rest of us should dress in our best to show respect and reverance for the Savior and His sacrament.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan, I understand your frustration because this was an attack from within. I've thought a lot about that. It might be a subject for a future post. I can definitely see why Moroni was so agitated and even furious with his people at times. It is discouraging: we have attacks from within in our homes and families; we have attacks from within in our churches; we have attacks from within in our country. And in all of this, we need to remain faithful and help our struggling brothers and sisters rise up to be prepared for attacks from without. We also need to be prepared to not follow the temptation to say, "I told you so. While "Charity never faileth," I think that we will, unless we ascribe to Charity with sincere humility.

      Thanks for your comments. Merry Christmas.

      Delete
  6. This is a great post. I'm glad that you shared, and you verbalized it so well.

    Two things that stand out to me are:
    1. Feminists - I am a woman, and once considered myself a feminist. I took several Women's Studies classes in college. Eventually, I came to the conclusion that feminism (like an "ism") is divisive. I don't find it particularly helpful. I look forward to the day when there isn't any manner of "ism" (similar to that of 4 Nephi 1:17).

    2. I've thought about the idea of the attack coming from within. I've wondered - perhaps an outside group came into a chapel to protest something about the church during sacrament. It would be frustrating and disrespectful. This is the same reason that I can't appreciate this whole "wear pants to church thing." It is crazy to think that people, who claim to know and understand the covenant that they have made and the ordinance of sacrament, would find protesting during sacrament meeting to be acceptable.

    I'm scratching my head on this. Women are already allowed to wear pants to sacrament meeting...I think that you hit the nail on the head - this isn't about pants at all...

    Anyways. thanks for the post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comments. It is great when comments add to a post and clarify it even further. It will be great when people don't have to say, "I am of Paul," or "I am of Apollos," or "I am of Cephas," but we can all say, "I am of Christ." (1 Corinthians 1:12)This has been going on a long time.

      I hope to personally understand the covenants I have made more fully as time goes by. It is amazing that our Father has offered everything that is His if we simply are obedient and faithful. Thank you for choosing "That good part."

      Merry Christmas

      Delete